Case study · Southeast Asia

GoTo: a merger doing a secondary market's job

GeographyIndonesia · Southeast Asia
SectorSuper-app / e-commerce
Period2021
Deal typeMerger-driven secondary liquidity
The Jakarta skyline at dusk
GoTo (Gojek–Tokopedia) — Indonesia, 2021.Jakarta — photo by Georgi Kovachev, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The situation

Gojek and Tokopedia were, independently, two of Indonesia's most valuable startups — Gojek in ride-hailing and payments, Tokopedia in e-commerce. Both had raised large rounds from a mix of regional and global investors over roughly a decade, and both faced the same structural problem common to Southeast Asian startups at the time: a shallow local IPO market and few clean paths to liquidity for early shareholders.

How the deal worked

In May 2021, the two companies merged to form GoTo, combining their businesses under a single holding structure ahead of a planned dual listing on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and, eventually, the Nasdaq. Mergers of this kind function partly as a secondary event in themselves: shareholders in the acquired or merging entities receive shares (or in some structures, a mix of shares and cash) in the new combined company, which is a step closer to a public listing and therefore a real exit than either standalone private company was. Some early investors and employees used the transaction window to also negotiate direct secondary sales of a portion of their new GoTo shares to investors wanting exposure ahead of the IPO.

The outcome

GoTo listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in April 2022, giving all shareholders — including those who had held Gojek or Tokopedia stock for years — a public, liquid market for the first time. The combined entity also became a proof point that regional consolidation can serve the same liquidity function that a deeper secondary market would otherwise need to provide.

What it teaches

In markets where secondary infrastructure and IPO pathways are still developing, M&A and mergers often substitute for a formal secondary market — the mechanism looks different, but the underlying need (converting long-held private equity into something transferable) is the same one driving secondary sales everywhere else.

What to look for in a deal like this

  • That the liquidity was a by-product of a corporate event rather than a liquidity programme — merger consideration, not a tender.
  • How share exchange ratios were set, since in a merger the price is negotiated between two companies, not by shareholders individually.
  • What each class of shareholder actually received, which in cross-border mergers can differ substantially by holder type.

Frequently asked

Can a merger create liquidity for private shareholders?

Yes, though usually indirectly: shareholders may receive shares in the combined entity, which later lists or becomes easier to sell. Cash consideration for private holders is less common but does occur.

Is merger consideration comparable to a tender price?

Not directly. A tender price is set for one company at one moment. Merger terms reflect a negotiation about the relative value of two businesses, plus control and strategic considerations that have no equivalent in a tender.

Compare this with the other Southeast Asia deals in thecase-study index, or readwhy secondary sales happen for the motivation behind each deal shape. The glossary defines the terms used above.