Case study · Oceania
Canva: liquidity as a retention tool, not a funding need

The situation
Canva, the Australian design-software company, reached profitability relatively early and has been reported as cash-generative for years — meaning it hasn't needed to raise primary capital the way most companies at its valuation typically do. That's unusual: most of the case studies in this series involve a company raising money and using part of the round for secondary liquidity. Canva didn't need the money. It ran tenders anyway.
How the deal worked
Canva has run periodic employee share sales — including a reported 2021 valuation mark near $40 billion and further tenders since — that function primarily as a compensation and retention mechanism rather than a byproduct of fundraising. Because the company wasn't raising new primary capital in these events, participating investors were there specifically to buy existing shares, agreeing on a price with the company (again typically anchored to a recent internal valuation or an independent third-party valuation) and purchasing directly from consenting employees.
The outcome
Employees got predictable, scheduled liquidity despite Canva showing no urgency to IPO — reducing the pressure that normally builds around a long-private, high-growth company. Because the tenders weren't tied to a capital need, Canva retained more control over its cap table composition and timing than a company forced to trade a full primary round for the option to include a secondary component.
What it teaches
A company doesn't need to be raising money to run a secondary liquidity program — profitable, well-capitalized companies increasingly treat tenders as a standalone HR and cap-table tool, separate from their financing strategy entirely.
What to look for in a deal like this
- The scheduling: a tender announced in advance and repeated on a known rhythm functions as part of compensation, not as a windfall.
- How much of an employee's holding may be sold per event, and whether unvested equity counts.
- Whether the buyer is a new investor, an existing one, or the company — this determines whether the ownership base is changing.
Frequently asked
Why do companies cap how much employees can sell?
To keep incentives aligned. A cap gives staff meaningful liquidity while ensuring they retain exposure to the outcome they are being asked to build toward.
Is a scheduled tender programme a benefit worth valuing at hiring?
It is worth asking about explicitly. Two offers with identical paper equity are not equivalent if one company runs regular liquidity events and the other has never run one.
Compare this with the other Oceania deals in thecase-study index, or readwhy secondary sales happen for the motivation behind each deal shape. The glossary defines the terms used above.